Andhra Pradesh local elections explained: dates, nominations, alliances and key races

• TDP: 9,460 ward nominations; 329 mayor/chairperson nominations.
• YSRCP: 8,175 ward nominations; 367 mayor/chairperson nominations.
• Jana Sena: 2,324 ward nominations; 100 mayor/chairperson nominations.
• BJP: 886 ward nominations; 27 mayor/chairperson nominations.
• Congress: 415 ward nominations; 117 mayor/chairperson nominations.

Other parties and independents account for the remaining filings. These are nomination counts, not certified numbers of distinct candidates, seats contested or final alliance nominees. KROV has not independently reconciled the statewide filing abstract with scrutiny results. Published ward totals also conflict, so a definitive statewide ward count is not stated here.

How are the alliances shaping the contest?

TDP, Jana Sena and BJP form the ruling NDA/Kutami alliance. YSRCP is the principal opposition competitor; Congress, other parties and independents also feature in the filing tally. Local reporting describes overlapping alliance nominations and ward-level allocation disputes in Vijayawada. Withdrawal-stage lists will clarify the actual contests.

Which candidates are attracting attention?

The following are reported party nominees, not a complete or certified post-withdrawal list.

• Visakhapatnam: Mukka Sravani, TDP; Varudu Kalyani, YSRCP.
• Vijayawada: Vangaveeti Radhakrishna, Jana Sena; Rayana Bhagya Lakshmi, YSRCP.
• Vizianagaram: Avanapu Bhargavi, TDP; Kolagatla Sravani, YSRCP.
• Nellore: Roop Kumar, TDP; Anam Vijay Kumar Reddy, YSRCP.
• Kadapa: Nelluturi Suvarna, TDP; Bandi Deepthi Reddy, YSRCP.
• Tirupati: Manne Srinivasa Prasad, popularly known as JB Srinivas, TDP.

What is the dispute over nominations?

YSRCP alleges that intimidation, attacks and obstruction prevented candidates from participating freely and has sought intervention. TDP rejects that account and accuses YSRCP of provoking violence. These are competing allegations; they do not establish responsibility for individual incidents.

KROV analysis: what matters next?

High filing numbers cannot by themselves predict a winner or settle complaints about access to nominations. The next meaningful checks are final candidate lists, verified uncontested declarations, complaint outcomes and the actual vote. Alliance coordination should be judged from the final contests, rather than adding allied parties' nomination papers together.